“Designer.” The adjective suggests an article of clothing. A handbag, a pair of shoes.
A few years ago I was crossing the street behind a
forty-something, fashionista in a white faux fur coat carrying an
oversized Prada handbag, when a man walking his 60-pound mutt crossed by her. Out of
nowhere came a harsh, virulent bark of a pint-sized yapper.
There was a tiny white-furred Pekapoo (cross between a
Pekinese and a toy poodle) inside the woman’s handbag. The dog's white fur matched her coat.
Claire Danes and her Schnoodle |
In the last decade especially, the mixing of breeds to
create “designer dogs” has led to the cross-breeding of
species to get a dog that doesn’t shed, has extra affection, a curly coat, and even
a dog that does not bark.
There are Labradoodles (labrador and
poodle) Chorkies (chihuahua and Yorkshire terrier), Puggles (beagle and pug), and Boggles (Boston Terrier and
beagle).
The AKC recognizes and lists 178 dogbreeds around the world. Do we really need to
take those breeds and cross breed them to see what we get? Does it provide a sense of creativity, like
making a painting or cooking a meal, to design our dogs genetically? Would we approve
if an alien species did that with
humans?
Rihanna and her Maltipoo |
My big issue with the “designer dog”
is not that they are bred, but that they are bred for nothing purposeful, created primarily to satisfy a trend. Allan Reznik, editor-in-chief of Dog
Fancy and Dog World in Irvine, California told National Geographic
that designer dogs are "indicative of a society that loves labels.”
And because they are trendy (often times
celebrity owners can popularize a breed) the sudden demand for the breeds
leads to unscrupulous breeders, i.e. puppy mills, that ramp up production when
the dogs are popular and abandon them when that popularity wanes.
The manipulating of genes to create new
species goes on in many industries–cattle, poultry, rodents, often in
association with maximizing food output or doing medical research. I believe
there is justification for some genetic engineering of canines–perhaps for
seeing-eye dogs or bomb-sniffing dogs.
But when it becomes a leisure activity,
when it becomes precious, when it becomes self-indulgence, then it breeds
unethical business.
With a million dogs being killed each
year according to the ASPCA, why do we want to encourage breeding new cross breeds
just because Claire Danes loves her Schnoodle (a miniature Schnauzer and
poodle)?
Dogs are not accessories, even if they
do look good in a handbag.
No comments:
Post a Comment